Process and Public Engagement

Process

Phase 1: Technical Analysis

The technical analysis (the focus of Phase 1) involved numerous opportunities to provide input and evaluate the assumptions that went into the energy pathways modeling, to tailor the alternatives analyzed by the pathways modeling to provide the most useful insights to inform policy discussions, and to shape the complementary analyses. Phase 1 started in May 2024 and culminated with the presentation of the modeling results in a public informational session on January 31, 2025. The modeling results were further evaluated and discussed in the Policy Working Groups in Phase 2.

Phase 2: Policy Discussions

During the policy discussions (the focus of Phase 2) ODOE held 17 Policy Working Group meetings, four Advisory Group meetings, four Inter-Agency Steering Group meetings, three public forums, and three information sessions to share technical modeling results and inform ODOE’s policy drafting. Phase 2 policy discussions built on key findings from the modeling and data on current trends. Materials and recordings of these meetings are available on ODOE’s website.

Engagement

Public engagement informed the design and focus of the technical analyses. Conversations with interested parties supported policy discussions, including evaluation of current progress, barriers, and options to advancing Oregon’s energy policy objectives. Dialogue and feedback helped define priorities in the Equity and Justice Framework. Partner and public input considered the merits of proposed legislative and policy actions and contributed to the recommendations and organization of this report.

ODOE heard interest throughout the strategy’s development that partner perspectives be considered critically and that dissenting voices be visible in the report. ODOE is committed to presenting an evenhanded, realistic view of the direction Oregon needs to follow to meet its energy policy objectives, and has incorporated information about barriers and challenges to the section on Pathways and Policies – consistent with where Phase 2 organized meetings to discuss these barriers. The written comment summary is a compilation of Phase 2 discussions and written comments, structured to match the organization of this report to facilitate review of what ODOE heard around each report section. This approach highlights where and how the Energy Strategy reflects partner input and where partners and members of the public expressed dissenting opinions.

The Oregon Energy Strategy has been a major undertaking and wouldn’t have been possible without the expertise and guidance from our consulting partners, the Clean Energy Transition Institute and Kearns & West; government-to-government engagement with Oregon’s nine federally recognized Tribes; our partner state agencies; members of our Advisory Group; several policy and technical working groups; and the Oregonians who joined us for webinars and information sessions.
— ODOE Director Janine Benner